occasional reflections on culture & politics
Fukuyama’s thesis is revisited in light of contemporary authoritarian resurgence. The post critiques premature triumphalism and argues that democracy remains fragile and contested. It calls for renewed philosophical engagement with history, ideology, and the conditions of freedom.
Identity is not fixed but forged through action, reflection, and engagement with others. The post draws on philosophical traditions to argue that purpose emerges from lived experience, not abstract ideals. A meaningful life requires both introspection and outward commitment.
Mortality is inevitable, but meaning is found in love. Life’s purpose isn’t grand achievement—it’s the daily choice to love deeply, patiently, and without judgment. Love is the center that holds amid uncertainty. If death comes after love, it’s a good day to die.
Religion is reframed as existential trust—a belief in meaning, order, and connection beyond oneself. The post critiques dogma and presents spirituality as a posture of openness, humility, and ethical engagement with the unknown.
Scientific thinking is empirical, provisional, and self-correcting. Mythological thinking is symbolic, moral, and narrative-driven. The post argues that both have value, but confusing them leads to epistemological chaos. Science explains; myth interprets. We need both—but must know which is which.
Erratic Attempts 