Abstract This essay examines science's enlightenment ideals of transparency and democratic knowledge against modern challenges. It traces humanity through three phases—pre-civilization, pre-modern civilization, and technology-driven modernity—highlighting how constant change creates instability. The author critiques both science denial and academic obscurantism, arguing that politicizing science (as with COVID-19 and climate change) breeds mistrust. While advocating for… Continue reading #317: Between Enlightenment and Obscurity: Restoring the Democratic Promise of Science
Tag: knowledge
#293: AI Extends Knowledge – If We Have Some Already
AI has the potential to enhance knowledge, but it requires users to possess a foundational understanding. As society surrenders critical thinking to AI tools, especially younger generations, we risk losing depth and nuance in knowledge acquisition. Relying too heavily on AI jeopardizes our ability to evaluate information meaningfully.
#281: A.I. Requires us to Know and Think More, Not Less. Some Reflections, With a Fascinating Bonus Response from AI
AI isn’t just an efficiency tool; it's a creeping seduction threatening our intellectual rigor. As we outsource thinking to algorithmic shortcuts, we risk losing our capacity for critical analysis and deep understanding. Embrace AI, but never relinquish the unique nuances of human thought—it's our only safeguard against becoming mindless automatons.
#199: Why Positionality Matters
The post argues that recognizing one’s positionality—social, cultural, and historical context—is essential for honest dialogue and intellectual humility. While arguments should stand on their own, identity shapes perception and bias. Acknowledging this fosters mutual respect, deeper understanding, and more constructive critique.
#177: Thinking Beyond Caricatures
Complexity is essential to understanding both ideas and people. Moral and political debates suffer when reduced to slogans or caricatures. True engagement demands humility, historical awareness, and intellectual rigor. Democracy requires expertise, not just opinion; knowledge must be earned, not assumed.





