occasional reflections on culture & politics
The possibility of being wrong about the war in Ukraine is considered not as a sign of weakness, but as a moral and intellectual responsibility. The post explores the dangers of false equivalence and the temptation to retreat into neutrality. It argues that acknowledging uncertainty must not lead to passivity or moral relativism. Instead, it calls for clarity in confronting aggression, recognizing the stakes of the conflict, and maintaining a principled stance even amid complexity and doubt.
Religious objections to “wokeness” are examined through Abrahamic traditions, emphasizing mercy, humility, and the fallibility of human judgment. The post critiques literalist interpretations used to justify discrimination and highlights scriptural calls for compassion. It argues that true faith supports dignity and inclusion, while cautioning against moral arrogance on all sides of the debate.
The post explores the backlash against “wokeness,” tracing its roots to cultural, religious, and political discomfort with systemic critiques of racism, gender norms, and social justice. It argues that resistance often stems from a misunderstanding of sin, fallibility, and humility, and critiques the idolization of rugged masculinity and traditionalism as barriers to empathy and progress.
Wokeness is defended as a moral stance rooted in empathy, justice, and historical awareness. The post critiques caricatures and argues that being “woke” means refusing complacency in the face of inequality. It’s not a fad—it’s a call to conscience.
Life is inherently tragic—defined by mortality, fallibility, and uncertainty. Yet this truth is liberating. The post argues that embracing impermanence allows us to live more fully, ethically, and reflectively. Meaning arises not from escaping tragedy but from choosing joy and compassion within it.
Erratic Attempts 